September 22, 2016

The setting is stunning, 8,000 feet up in the Rockies. Colorado in September, aspen, screaming blue skies, bright clear nights. Who wants to be inside listening to endless presenters and trapped in a trade show maze?

Raterfest is a different kind of conference. It's small and it's spacious. Energylogic's 'unconference' has only one session track, with a few breakout sessions. There's 30 minute gaps between the 1-hour sessions. There are no keynote speakers while your eating. There's a shit-ton of socializing and unstructured time.

At a typical 3-5 day conference, I usually bug out at the 1.5 day mark. My brain is full and I need some serious gap time to process what's been fired at me. I may miss something terrific between day 1.5 and day 2, but...

I know, I know, large, national conferences are a different beast. Attendees expect a smorgasborg, where they can pick and choose from several tracks and max out the number of CEUs they can rack up for multiple designations.

Intense + Unstructured

Raterfest was intense, for all the unstructured time. In between the sessions people discussed what had been presented while soaking up the glorious sunshine. Everyone arrived at the next session awake and aware, if still a little bleary from the nighttime activities...

The thing is, we only glean 10% of our on-the-job knowledge from formal training, so extended opportunities for informal learning like the session gaps at RaterFest are very important. The more we get to socialize the knowledge, the more we share values and common experiences, the more the learning resolves issues and the relevancy factor goes up.

I presented on ways for raters to develop some strategies for in-field informal learning to help close the building science knowledge gap, so that we can be more effective agents of change in the industry. I talked a little about adult education and some of the ways to engage people in learning.

The Irony of A Presentation on Adult Education

The irony of presenting this stuff at a conference didn't go past me ... the fundamental problem with most conferences and many, many presentations is that they don't take into consideration the basic principles of adult education.

It's nobody's fault, really. Many conferences evolved out of peer-to-peer presentations: geeked-out engineers talking to geeked-out engineers. That's not who makes up the bulk of the participants at building industry conferences any more. Conference organizers don't require presenters to have adult education background, nor do they provide guidelines for presentation structures that follow well-founded principles.

Presenters are passionate about the topics they're presenting on, they're not adult educators, they're experts in their own fields, and they're geeked-out.

As a result, many 60 or 90 minute sessions are in lecture format, with no breaks and little participation from the learners. This flies in the face of what we know about adult learning: you've got about 15-30 minutes of teaching time on a topic before your audience starts to glaze over. Here's what every presenter needs to keep in mind when developing a conference session:

People are Problem Solvers, Not Content Consumers

One way to make conference sessions more effective would be to have some guidelines for presenters on how to structure a session. Those presentation guidelines need to be based on adult education principles that can be summed up like this:

Tell me a story that builds on my prior knowledge so I can relate to your topic.

Your story has to spiral in from the big picture to the details so I get the context.

Learning is a two-way social event, not a passive filling of my brain. Engage me.



Schedule Service


What our customers are saying

  • If you are planning a house build or renovation, understanding Building Science is important to avoid repetitive heating costs and possible water damage later. Shawna and her team know their stuff.

    K.W., General Manager, Halifax, NS
  • Studies over the last 20 years have shown a worrying energy performance gap – where buildings are consistently found to use more heating energy than designers had predicted and Energy Performance Certificates indicate.

    Oliver Drerup, Former Head of Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation - International
  • I am pleased to hear that you will be undertaking a new initiative to further trades training in residential energy efficiency. CMHC supports the building of industry awareness and capacity to deliver more sustainable technologies and practices in the housing sector.

    Duncan Hill, P. Eng., Acting Director, Sustainable Housing and Communities Policy and Research Policy, Research and Planning, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
  • Over the last 20+ years I have been speaking to and training thousands of new home builders and renovators across North America.

    Gord Cooke, Air Solutions
  • All I can say is … wow!  You have nailed it! I just watched the 5 minute overview of what all your training videos will attempt to accomplish, and am very impressed.  I am so proud that I know you both, this is incredibly good.

    Gregory A. Pedrick, C.E.M., Project Manager, New York State Energy Efficiency Agency
  • This training is easy use and in a perfect format.

    Dan Drummond, Training Director, Canada Wood China
  • It is very well centred on the learner's experience. Visually-based rather than text-based delivery make the modules straightforward and non-intimidating. I like the way the expected learning outcomes are clearly presented and the information is clearly applicable to practical work.

    Michelle Harding, Professional Builders Institute of BC
  • This is primo education that goes way beyond training.

    Chris Rosemont, BASF